> On Jul 25, 2020, at 5:36 PM, Sage Gerard <s...@sagegerard.com> wrote: > > I know this isn't a PLT-sanctioned approach, but I'd like to know if there's > any warmth to the direction I'm headed here.
There is no such thing as “PLT-sanctioned”. If you can improve Racket, go for it. If you can construct tools that are better suited for the working Racket programmer, just do it. Racket is out there for everyone who wants to build a better programming context. We started it and we will not be jealous if someone does better. That’s what it’s here for. (An analogy that may not work. My proudest achievement is to hire a young person as an assistant professor who will one day achieve much more than I have.) — Matthias -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/28A0C879-5FFF-4324-BC9E-7EA730671B7C%40felleisen.org.
