On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Greg Hendershott <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey wait a second. Aren't Racket pointers a couple bits less than 32? > Like, say, 30 bits? And that's 1 GB address space? Q.E.D. ... ?
Racket uses the "odd" pointers to represent small integers, but I don't think that matters much here, since those pointers aren't generally useful (as a pointer incrementing by one (when viewed as an integer) moves to the next byte, not the next word). Robby _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
