On Jul 14, Greg Hendershott wrote: > [4] More memory debugging tools would be helpful, as it's > non-trivial to correlate Racket data to bytes (e.g. no C-style > sizeof).
About this point: there's `current-memory-use', which can provide you with a rough number, so you can allocate some N whatevers, then use it again and check out the difference. It's no replacement for a memory debugging tool, but I think that it covers the "sizeof dept". (Which is itself not too well defined in case of pointers and a structures that make up an arbitrary pointer graph.) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users