On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 16:17, Nadeem Abdul Hamid <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, yes, on second thought, I guess it is fine. With your fix, > > (struct-copy sub (sub 1 2 3) [c 4]) ==> (sub 1 2 4) > (struct-copy sub (sub 1 2 3) [b 4]) ==> (sub 1 4 3) > (struct-copy base (sub 1 2 3) [b 4]) ===> (base 1 4) > > is that right? So that sentence applies to the third situation. > > I guess when the second one didn't work, I assumed somehow that "id" > could only be the struct type where the field was actually defined. So > it was a bug. Sorry for the confusion,
Isn't the second case the case Robby said it still doesn't work? _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
