On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Pierpaolo Bernardi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 16:17, Nadeem Abdul Hamid <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ok, yes, on second thought, I guess it is fine. With your fix, >> >> (struct-copy sub (sub 1 2 3) [c 4]) ==> (sub 1 2 4) >> (struct-copy sub (sub 1 2 3) [b 4]) ==> (sub 1 4 3) >> (struct-copy base (sub 1 2 3) [b 4]) ===> (base 1 4) >> >> is that right? So that sentence applies to the third situation. >> >> I guess when the second one didn't work, I assumed somehow that "id" >> could only be the struct type where the field was actually defined. So >> it was a bug. Sorry for the confusion, > > Isn't the second case the case Robby said it still doesn't work?
Oh, sorry, yes: you'd have to write this: (struct-copy sub (sub 1 2 3) [b #:parent base 4]) or else it would be a syntax error. Robby _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
