Yesterday, Jon Rafkind wrote:
>
> This is mostly straight-forward except that to get the right lexical
> scope for `get-x1' we need to do a little hack (by assuming the
> argument list has at least one thing in it). Of course the original
> macro could enforce such a property as well.
Why not use `stx' directly?
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
