On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:52, Eli Barzilay <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yesterday, Jon Rafkind wrote: > > > > This is mostly straight-forward except that to get the right lexical > > scope for `get-x1' we need to do a little hack (by assuming the > > argument list has at least one thing in it). Of course the original > > macro could enforce such a property as well. > > Why not use `stx' directly? > > Could you elaborate? `stx' in the docs does not look relevant.
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
