Something worth noting is that they only offer CGI, whatever the language... so you won't be able to run the racket web server. AFAICT, the most cost-effective options for running the web server would still be a virtual shared host or WebFaction.
BTW, any experience with WebFaction? On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Asumu Takikawa <as...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > On 2011-09-07 13:48:04 +0100, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: >> I just came across this one by accident. >> >> http://example.nfshost.com/versions.php > > FWIW, I've been using NFS for a number of years and have had a good > experience with them. Their usage-based billing is nice for small volume > sites and they scale the per-MB cost so that high-volume sites are > practical too. > > I haven't taken advantage of their Racket/Scheme support though, so > YMMV. > > Cheers, > Asumu > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
