On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Joan Arnaldich <jarnald...@gmail.com> wrote: > Something worth noting is that they only offer CGI, whatever the > language... so you won't be able to run the racket web server. AFAICT, > the most cost-effective options for running the web server would still > be a virtual shared host or WebFaction.
I have; they've been great for me. I have my own installation of Racket on their servers. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
