On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Grant Rettke <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> wrote: > > (The Racket run-time system and compiler is mostly in C, but I think a > > lot of it --- especially the compiler --- is likely to move to Racket > > in the coming years.) > > Forgive the dumb question but here goes, are there research > opportunities in cutting over the compiler to Racket or is it for some > other reason to cut over to Racket there? > Beauty does not need any other reason ;)
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
