At Mon, 1 Oct 2012 08:48:21 -0500, Grant Rettke wrote: > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> wrote: > > (The Racket run-time system and compiler is mostly in C, but I think a > > lot of it --- especially the compiler --- is likely to move to Racket > > in the coming years.) > > Forgive the dumb question but here goes, are there research > opportunities in cutting over the compiler to Racket or is it for some > other reason to cut over to Racket there?
I don't currently see research opportunities there --- just the obvious practical benefits. ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
