On 2013-02-18 12:47:21 +0000, Tim Brown wrote: > I've just had a poke around and seen that Racket is considered a dialect > of scheme, and there are many tasks that have the scheme entry marked as > "works with racket", but not in a way that shows the task is implemented > as a Racket example. (I've just looked at Category:Programming_Languages, > and Racket isn't even listed).
It used to be listed as a separate language actually. There was some dicussion here: http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Category_talk:Racket I'm not sure what the policy is, if there is one. Cheers, Asumu ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
