On Feb 22, 2013, at 3:35 PM, Norman Gray wrote: > (Just by the way (and whirling off at a tangent), is there a > method/rhetoric/clannishness to your capitalisation of LISP? If one wanted > to avoid 'Lisp', then I'd have guessed that 'LisP' would be the preferred > form, but that looks just weird)
(No. If you go back to my original message, you will see that I use two different capitalizations. But I will say that the only ones I know and use are LISP and Lisp.) ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
