I think the best way to win this game is not to play... but... if I just had to run bomberman and nothing else, I would revive the VMkit version of Racket that can launch a micro-version of Linux and go directly into Racket. Then I would implement a text/console-based version of Bomberman... which would be pretty easy I think... and then be done. The time it would take to add graphics to VMkit in a convenient way would be way too much pain in my mind.
Although I see the appeal of "rewrite the world in Racket", at least in the long run of safety and extensibility, I also value existing software that works that other people wrote so I don't have to. Jay On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:50 AM, 김태윤 <[email protected]> wrote: > how would you write bomberman without OS? > > which way would be the most efficient way? or which way would you prefer? > there must be an assembler at first. so let's begin with an assembler. > > story: > you bought a new OSless computer but it contains assembler.(bootloader > level) > and you want to play your own bomberman within this computer. > > > you can choose and make strategy out of options below. (you also can create > more option to choose. see option 7.) > > 1. > play bomberman on other computer to know the rules and see sprites. > 2. > write tiny racket interpreter using assembler to increase efficiency. > 3. > write tiny sprite editor using racket interpreter. > 4. > write file system > 5. > write DrRacket runnable OS to run DrRacket to work in highest efficiency > 6. > see how other people made bomberman. to follow bloom's taxonomy > 7. > something else rather than idea above. > 8. > use paper and pencil to design bomberman and make it with assembly > language.(without racket language abstraction) > 9. > surf the web with other computer until you found 'how to make bomberman > without OS complete step by step tutorial' document > > some might prefer option 1, 5, 6. > some might spend many months for option 9. > and some might try option 8. > > in the past, I tried option 9 almost always. but now I know it is not that > good. > which one do you prefer? > option 7? > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > -- Jay McCarthy <[email protected]> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
