Very strange.
I did the same on my other computer and there it has the same problem as
before.
I use windows 7 on both systems one with 64 bit OS and one with 32 bit OS.
The 64 bit version does well, the 32 bit windows 7 system has the problem.
May be my preferences? 
Thanks, Jos

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jos Koot [mailto:jos.k...@gmail.com] 
> Sent: viernes, 20 de junio de 2014 23:03
> To: 'Alexander D. Knauth'
> Cc: 'users'; 'Jos Koot'
> Subject: RE: [racket] newlines in strings not the same in 
> DrRacket and Racket
> 
> Gives me
>  
> (format "~n") = "\n"
> "
> " = "\n"
> The only test passed!
> 
> both in DrRacket and Racket.
> Very surprising. Can you explain what happens here?
> I don't have a clue.
> Thanks,
> Jos
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
>       From: Alexander D. Knauth [mailto:alexan...@knauth.org] 
>       Sent: viernes, 20 de junio de 2014 22:41
>       To: Jos Koot
>       Cc: users
>       Subject: Re: [racket] newlines in strings not the same 
> in DrRacket and Racket
>       
>       
>       This doesn't exactly solve your problem, but what 
> happens (for both cases) when you do this?:
>       #lang racket
>       (require test-engine/racket-tests)
>       (display "(format \"~n\") = ") (format "~n")
>       (display "\"") (newline)
>       (display "\" = ") "
>       "
>       (check-expect (format "~n") "
>       ")
>       (test)
>       (void (read-line)) ; wait until the user has read the results.
> 
>       On Jun 20, 2014, at 3:02 PM, Jos Koot 
> <jos.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>               Running the following in DrRacket goes well.
>               
>               #lang racket
>               (require test-engine/racket-tests)
>               (check-expect (format "~n") "
>               ")
>               (test)
>               (read-line) ; wait until the user has read the results.
>               
>               Displays: The only test passed!
>               
>               But running the same with Racket tells me the 
> test fails.
>               I have a solution for this by removing #\return 
> from the strings to be
>               compared.
>               
>               Question though: Can I solve this problem in a 
> simpler way?
>               May be I overlooked something in the docs?
>               
>               Best wishes, Jos
>               
>               
>               ____________________
>                Racket Users list:
>                http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>               
> 
> 
> 

____________________
  Racket Users list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

Reply via email to