Or are you using different editors? Different editors might use different
conventions for representing newlines.
When the 32 bit one has the problem, what does it say?
For example when I made the text file with DrRacket or TextEdit but ran it with
racket (not DrRacket), it worked,
but when I made the text file with Microsoft Word, it gave me this:
$ racket newline-3.txt
(format "~n") = "\n"
"
" = "\r"
Ran 1 check.
0 checks passed.
Actual value
, the expected value.
In newline-3.txt at line 7 column 0
On Jun 20, 2014, at 5:14 PM, Jos Koot <jos.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Very strange.
> I did the same on my other computer and there it has the same problem as
> before.
> I use windows 7 on both systems one with 64 bit OS and one with 32 bit OS.
> The 64 bit version does well, the 32 bit windows 7 system has the problem.
> May be my preferences?
> Thanks, Jos
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jos Koot [mailto:jos.k...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: viernes, 20 de junio de 2014 23:03
>> To: 'Alexander D. Knauth'
>> Cc: 'users'; 'Jos Koot'
>> Subject: RE: [racket] newlines in strings not the same in
>> DrRacket and Racket
>>
>> Gives me
>>
>> (format "~n") = "\n"
>> "
>> " = "\n"
>> The only test passed!
>>
>> both in DrRacket and Racket.
>> Very surprising. Can you explain what happens here?
>> I don't have a clue.
>> Thanks,
>> Jos
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> From: Alexander D. Knauth [mailto:alexan...@knauth.org]
>> Sent: viernes, 20 de junio de 2014 22:41
>> To: Jos Koot
>> Cc: users
>> Subject: Re: [racket] newlines in strings not the same
>> in DrRacket and Racket
>>
>>
>> This doesn't exactly solve your problem, but what
>> happens (for both cases) when you do this?:
>> #lang racket
>> (require test-engine/racket-tests)
>> (display "(format \"~n\") = ") (format "~n")
>> (display "\"") (newline)
>> (display "\" = ") "
>> "
>> (check-expect (format "~n") "
>> ")
>> (test)
>> (void (read-line)) ; wait until the user has read the results.
>>
>> On Jun 20, 2014, at 3:02 PM, Jos Koot
>> <jos.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Running the following in DrRacket goes well.
>>
>> #lang racket
>> (require test-engine/racket-tests)
>> (check-expect (format "~n") "
>> ")
>> (test)
>> (read-line) ; wait until the user has read the results.
>>
>> Displays: The only test passed!
>>
>> But running the same with Racket tells me the
>> test fails.
>> I have a solution for this by removing #\return
>> from the strings to be
>> compared.
>>
>> Question though: Can I solve this problem in a
>> simpler way?
>> May be I overlooked something in the docs?
>>
>> Best wishes, Jos
>>
>>
>> ____________________
>> Racket Users list:
>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
