Thanks, I take note of that. I was mislead by the examples in the infix docs of Jens Axel Søgaard. These examples start with #lang at-exp scheme. Sorry, my fault. Jos
_____ From: Alexander D. Knauth [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: viernes, 24 de abril de 2015 12:59 To: Jos Koot Cc: Jens Axel Søgaard; [email protected] Subject: Re: [racket-users] infix notation embedded in Racket On Apr 24, 2015, at 3:40 AM, Jos Koot <[email protected]> wrote: With respect to at-exp: I want my infix to be a simple macro that can be required within any arbitrary #lang racket module and cooperates well with all binding forms in that module. Well, since at-exp can be used with not only #lang racket but others as well (scheme, rackjure, clojure, afl, sweet-exp, basically anything that looks at the readtable), and doesn’t interfere with or require anything about the bindings, at-exp and (planet soegaard/infix) can be used with any arbitrary #lang whatever module as long as #lang whatever looks at the readtable and supports require. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
