I think Rackets's reference and guide are *very clear* about eq?, eqv? and
equal?.
They are even described well for structures and hashes and much more.
Be aware, though, that in general equality can be interpreted in many ways.
At the mathematical level equality is a difficult and in many cases even an
unsolvable thing.

Jos




-----Original Message-----
From: racket-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:racket-users@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Michael Tiedtke
Sent: lunes, 18 de mayo de 2015 19:00
To: racket-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [racket-users] Strange behaviour of the eq? operator in racket
repl

SNIP

Rackets 's reference and guide sometimes are a bit vague about these things.
So it's better to check their current standard R6RS. When you open the
documentation and search for eq? you should see several results:
rnrs/base-6 is the one you want to have a look at. But as far as I could see
Gambit
does not support R6RS so you might want to check r5rs, too.

SNIP

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to