I think Rackets's reference and guide are *very clear* about eq?, eqv? and equal?. They are even described well for structures and hashes and much more. Be aware, though, that in general equality can be interpreted in many ways. At the mathematical level equality is a difficult and in many cases even an unsolvable thing.
Jos -----Original Message----- From: racket-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:racket-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Tiedtke Sent: lunes, 18 de mayo de 2015 19:00 To: racket-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [racket-users] Strange behaviour of the eq? operator in racket repl SNIP Rackets 's reference and guide sometimes are a bit vague about these things. So it's better to check their current standard R6RS. When you open the documentation and search for eq? you should see several results: rnrs/base-6 is the one you want to have a look at. But as far as I could see Gambit does not support R6RS so you might want to check r5rs, too. SNIP -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.