This is really exciting and you've obviously put a lot of time and thought into it!
One part I'm not sure about is `conj`. I understand sometimes "whichever end is optimal" matters more than the order. But: 1. What if you do care about the order? IOW should there also be generic "cons" and "snoc"? 2. With ordinary Racket immutable vectors, is the tail really faster? I don't think "snoc" (vector-append original-vector (vector new-item)) is faster than "cons" (vector-append (vector new-item) original-vector)? Also, in my (admittedly limited) time so far with Clojure, I've sometimes been confused when eager collections automagically change into lazy sequences. If I add side effects (like debugging printfs) to code I don't realize is lazy, I utter many WTFs. I'm not sure to what extent that can happen with your library, but if it can, this might be good to point out in margin notes and examples. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
