I've started on that, but shuffle doesn't exist properly yet for generic collections. I could just use (shuffle (sequence->list ....)), but, what would be the best way of representing this? Generic collections give you the freedom of creating a new type of data structure just for shuffled sequence, so would it be best to do that, or something else?
> On Oct 12, 2015, at 7:45 PM, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > > Take a crack at it. > > I am pretty sure I have introduced the proper level of representation > independence (I can hear Ben laugh all the way now — Typed Racket > doesn’t have types) and the typed documentation is pretty solid. (I’ll > do types later to validate.) > >> On Oct 12, 2015, at 7:37 PM, Alex Knauth <alexan...@knauth.org> wrote: >> >> What about Alexis King's persistent vectors? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
