> On Jan 17, 2016, at 2:50 PM, Brian Adkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > With built-in string-trim, the lowest of three runs was 10293. Using your > string-trim the lowest of three runs was 7618, so it reduced the runtime by > 26%.
Would converting this into a `bytes-trim` function that only works with byte-strings help more? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
