On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 6:26 AM, Saša Janiška <g...@atmarama.com> wrote: > "Jos Koot" <jos.k...@gmail.com> writes: > > Hello Jos, > >> I am a Racket-using hobbyist. It surprises me that, according to the >> observation, not many hobbyists are using Racket. > > Seeing so much proliferation of JS crap it looks like people are really > going insane. :-) >
One advantage of JS is tht you can run it in every browser in every computer in the word. But it has a few disadvantages, so someone adds a thin wrapper to improve some details and fix incompatibilities between browsers. Then the wrapper gets more features, until it's contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of Common Lisp^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Racket. Part of the solution may be to get a Racket to JavaScript compiler. I think there are two or three projects, with different advance level. Gustavo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
