FWIW the LGPL is more restrictive than MIT. I license my Racket packages under the LGPL mostly for consistency. But the practical benefit is that I can copy Racket code into the package if I want to. I wouldn't be able to do that if I were using MIT (because the MIT license would be promising rights in the code that are not mine to give away). The California bar would want me to add that this is not legal advice, but rather general information from some random dude on a mailing list.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
