Jack Firth wrote on 01/31/2017 03:11 PM:
If the package build server and catalog hosted built packages for multiple Racket versions, I think we could go a long ways towards removing the need to split packages completely.
If there's important requirements driving that, and if that's a good solution.
I've seen a lot of effort put into infrastructure size&complexity bloat (e.g., creating several separate implementation variations for essentially the same thing, in case anyone ever wants to do it one of those many ways) that looks like it will likely encumber solving actual very important ongoing problems.
Sometimes size/complexity bloat is worthwhile or at least benign, sometimes closer to malignant.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
