The Lotka-Volterra example is very helpful, thanks. It is still a bit unclear from the formatting which part is the Leibniz code. Is it the two lines marked pp1 and pp2? Are they literal code? I guess I prefer to use a typewriter face to make verbatim code clear, though that may be at odds with the script-D.
Of more consequence, it would be helpful to know what “happens”. I can *write* this in Leibniz; that's good. Can I do anything more/else? Maybe now, or at least perhaps in the future? Can I do a numeric simulation? Will there be a Runge-Kutta solver? What about discretization issues? Etc. Put differently, why write it in Leibniz instead of writing it as just a regular Racket `reactor` program? Btw, I'm not entirely sure what the notation ℝp means. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
