On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:55:14PM -0700, Lehi Toskin wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 at 9:07:14 AM UTC-7, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
The Interaction Window in DrRacket supports snips, picts etc., so it is 
reasonable that is slower than a terminal.
But ... maybe it is possible to let the user choose a simpler interaction 
window. One that only supports text?
As a feasibility experiment, is William Hatch's terminal faster than the 
DrRacket interaction window?


/Jens Axel

Actually, using rackterm with some script that prints a lot will make the 
rackterm terminal freeze up. I have to kill the process before anything visible 

Late to the party because I was in the wilderness for a week.

Rackterm is probably significantly worse than the DrRacket interaction
window.  Rackterm currently does nothing very clever, just draws on a
canvas% for printing, and is very slow.  It's the main reason I still
can't really use it as a daily-driver terminal emulator, so it's high
on my list of priorities for Rackterm.  But Rackterm isn't high on my
list of priorities right now, so...

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to