I think it is a bad idea to dump output into the interactions that
isn't being printed by the program.
There is a logging window, perhaps that can be used?
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 5:25 PM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
> This is a great idea: I feel like this change would deliver 80% of what I
> want, and be easy to implement. It would give a concrete and recognizable
> visual “path” of the compilation. I would not be inclined to delete it when
> finished. Could it ever be long? Would it make other people unhappy to see
> this output (presumably not in teaching languages?)?
>> On Oct 28, 2017, at 13:42, Ben Greenman <benjaminlgreen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I like the output `raco make -v ....` gives on the command-line.
>> How about piping that into the interactions window?
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Racket Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.