On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:08 AM, David Storrs <david.sto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> assembled.  There's no reason not to use functional update, but I
> haven't seen a straightforward way to do that since there is no
> 'set-db-chunk-foo' as opposed to 'set-db-chunk-foo!'.   I guess I need
> to use 'struct-copy'?  At that point it seems more sensible to have a

There is a struct-update package:




You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to