On 18-08-16 11:43, 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Users wrote: > I really, really don't like nesting and a few years ago adopted the > style of internal defines. It makes for much more readable code: > > (define (foo x) > (define y (f x)) > (define z (g y)) > (define p (h z)) > > (bar p))
Thank you to Paulo and everybody else for your very helpful feedback. When it comes to nesting (which, I guess, means the use of let) vs internal defines: is this purely an aesthetic thing? Regards, Bob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
