I put a package up but it has no license info in the code. I would add one which is the most permissive possible that wouldn't cause conflict. I guess this is BSD? MIT?
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, 12:30 PM Neil Van Dyke <n...@neilvandyke.org> wrote: > BTW, I don't know the status of possible new GPL and LGPL versions in > progress, but, if any Racket people have some insights into how to > improve the "linking" concepts or some other aspect, in the spirit of > FSF goals, the FSF has seemed open to comments. If you don't know who > else to contact, you can always email RMS. > > You can get as technical as necessary. Organizationally, besides the > FSF being founded by and attracting some high-powered techies, some > advisors are very noteworthy Scheme people. Also, a Scheme with > multiple `#lang`s (though it wasn't called `#lang`) was actually a > central part of the GNU roadmap, from early on. (And probably would've > been in popular use atop Linux for over a decade now, but for another > party's business decision, outside of FSF's control, not a technical or > acceptance reason.) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.