I am so glad that I'm not the only one who does this. On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 2:16 PM 'John Clements' via Racket Users < racket-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> D’oh! It’s just called subset? > > Sorry, > > John > > > > On Oct 4, 2018, at 11:16 AM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users < > racket-users@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > > > It seems strange to me that we have (AFAICT) set-union, set-subtract, > and set-member?, but not set-subset?. Would it make sense for me to propose > a pull request for this? (it would just be (set-empty? (set-subtract b a)), > I realize…) > > > > John > > > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Racket Users" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
