Hi all, I'm exploring macros today.
I'd like to introduce a set of bindings. For example, I would like (introduce tag a b c) to become (define (tag-get-a) ...) (define (tag-set-a! v) ...) or somesuch set of defines. I've discovered with-syntax and format-id, and have had good success with introducing singular defines, but how to expand the list of ids into a list of defines is something I'm not seeing yet. Somehow, I feel like a macro that simply follows the natural recursion on the syntax objects is probably the answer, but... that's like saying the answer to a question in quantum mechanics is either 0, 1, or h-bar/2... I'm looking at the define-cbr example in the documentation, and suspicious that I'm reaching a point with my macro authoring where the ... and (... ...) are leaving me confused as to which layer of expansion I'm dealing with as I look at my code. Hence, I'm asking for a nudge in the right direction. Cheers, Matt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
