Thank you for all the hard work you've put into this, everyone. The benchmark graphs are impressive! One thing that surprised me is that there are a handful of tests (tak1, dynamic2, tak, mazefun, maze2, collatz-q, collatz) where Racket/CS actually outperformed CS. How is that possible?
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 8:37 AM Laurent <laurent.ors...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Just wanted to say thank you for the update and for the honest report. > > I look forward to using Racket CS, and to seeing how easily new features can > be incorporated :) > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 2:49 PM Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: >> >> Here's a new status report on Racket CS: >> >> http://blog.racket-lang.org/2019/01/racket-on-chez-status.html >> >> Short version: Racket CS is done in a useful sense, but we'll wait >> until it gets better before making it the default Racket >> implementation. >> >> >> Matthew >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Racket Users" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
