> On Feb 21, 2019, at 10:32 PM, Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hin...@fastmail.net>
> wrote:
>
> The main difference, as has been pointed out before, is that Python
> generators are more common as an idiom for solving problems that in Racket
> would typically be approached differently.
[[ This is of course ironic in a way, given how much research the Scheme/PLT
Scheme/Racket community did on continuations and friends and how many times
this was motivated in the introductions to papers with “generators”
“coroutines” “threads” and similar, now-modern ideas of control. But it’s
better to learn and to improve than to stick with old ideas just for the heck
of sticking with them. Use control when appropriate. ]]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
