Hmm… While I certainly agree that functional languages are good at manipulating program representations, this job (manipulating programs) is more or less *the one thing* that Racket does better than any other language. So… I guess I’d be more likely to use Racket to manipulate Haskell programs than vice versa. Of course, your mileage may vary… :)
John Clements > On May 14, 2019, at 8:23 AM, Josh Rubin <jlru...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It just occurred to me that Haskell could be a powerful way to manipulate > programs in other languages (like Scheme or Racket). Unfortunately, I don't > know Haskell. Has anybody been down this path? > -- > Josh Rubin > > jlru...@gmail.com > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/d2961559-f8af-c6d0-15e1-9c20b3dab959%40gmail.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/a2d3bd9a-5057-4c36-aa52-0862ad103a0b%40mtasv.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
