The last time I saw a colleague sit down to write a compiler in Haskell, they first had to do a bunch of heavy lifting to get the type system to play along sensibly.
http://offog.org/publications/fita200811-generics.pdf Your mileage may vary. I'd just use Racket. (See John's note.) Cheers, Matt On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 11:23 AM Josh Rubin <jlru...@gmail.com> wrote: > It just occurred to me that Haskell could be a powerful way to manipulate > programs in other languages (like Scheme or Racket). Unfortunately, I don't > know Haskell. Has anybody been down this path? > > -- > Josh rubinjlru...@gmail.com > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/d2961559-f8af-c6d0-15e1-9c20b3dab959%40gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/d2961559-f8af-c6d0-15e1-9c20b3dab959%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAAGM4551VVwp-QLVpMWw2nHd16SHOin-UoJi6w6JyG%2BnnQMDGw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
