On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 08:53:17PM -0700, Andrew Gwozdziewycz wrote: > > I'm in favor of a different syntax if it doesn't add new semantics > along with it. I'm also in favor of an s-expression based syntax that > uses less parens all together. In other words, I think a way to > proceed might be to have syntax be actually surface, and completely > inter-changeable, such that if I prefer s-expressions, Dr Racket > allows me to edit that way. If I prefer an infix representation, Dr > Racket can read the s-expressions and convert it to infix, and convert > it back on save (Or the other way around depending on the code base > preferences).
Scribble is an example of how two syntaxes can coexist in one source file. -- hendrik -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20190721134310.r275b7qt2vji3igl%40topoi.pooq.com.
