On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 08:53:17PM -0700, Andrew Gwozdziewycz wrote: > > I'm in favor of a different syntax if it doesn't add new semantics > along with it. I'm also in favor of an s-expression based syntax that > uses less parens all together. In other words, I think a way to > proceed might be to have syntax be actually surface, and completely > inter-changeable, such that if I prefer s-expressions, Dr Racket > allows me to edit that way. If I prefer an infix representation, Dr > Racket can read the s-expressions and convert it to infix, and convert > it back on save (Or the other way around depending on the code base > preferences).
Scribble is an example of how two syntaxes can coexist in one source file. -- hendrik -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20190721134310.r275b7qt2vji3igl%40topoi.pooq.com.
