On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 02:50:06PM -0700, Ilnar Selimcan wrote: ... > > Arithmetic expressions can be included in s-expression code by simply > wrapping them with $ signs, like in Latex. '''

LaTeX ... interesting. It is a pure notation without semantics. That is, it is a notation whose semantics *is* notation. Although mathematical expressions (which Latex is all about) have tree structure (like MathML does, and is excessively wordy), for the most part latex represents mathematics as just a symbol cluster. It does have some nesting, indicated by special brackets, for when the layout itself needs two-dimensions. That said, it doesn't even have a stable syntax. I tried to find a grammar for parsing LaTeX, and discovered there is none. It seems LaTeX's macros do the parsing, and they're a Turing-complete laanguage. It makes me appreciate Scribble. -- hendrik -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20190827131628.i543jc5bhbhpdhzr%40topoi.pooq.com.