The plai languages pre-date submodules, so you're right that they were not tested or designed to support them. It might be possible, but I am skeptical about it being a quick fix. The problem might just be that they are built on `scheme` but if they were built on `racket` everything would just work.
Jay -- Jay McCarthy Associate Professor @ CS @ UMass Lowell http://jeapostrophe.github.io Vincit qui se vincit. On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 8:33 PM David Bremner <da...@tethera.net> wrote: > > As part of an effort to use plai/gc2 with the racket handin server > (never having really successfully used the multiple file stuff), I've > been trying (and failing) to use modules in one file for the collector > and mutator. > > Attached is the simplest possible example I could cook up using sample > code from the web. In racket 7.6 I get a complaint about 'submod: not a > require sub-form ; in: (submod ".." null-gc)'. That doesn't seem right > to me, but I guess maybe allocator-setup was never tested with a > submodule path. Any workaround/correction is welcome. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/87a74ddvyp.fsf%40tethera.net > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAJYbDa%3DiNs5OR1kAWz8uYg_DsQfw9jjPtEFk0eJ0Rcz8sTukxA%40mail.gmail.com.
