Sorawee Porncharoenwase <sorawee.pw...@gmail.com> writes:

>>
>> Thank you for the package! So, do I understand correcty that it is
>> impossible to produce multi-valued streams with for/stream? If so, maybe
>> it's worth adding a note about it to the documentation of for/stream?
>>
>
> That is correct. Feel free to submit a PR to improve the documentation. You
> will need to edit this file:
> https://github.com/racket/racket/blob/master/pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/reference/sequences.scrbl#L1186

I have created a draft pull request:
https://github.com/racket/racket/pull/3147

>> Also, I notice in the manual of your package that you mention that
>> generators are inefficient in the default implementation of
>> Racket. Since I'm using generators too, I'm curious about the
>> performance implications - where can I read more about it?
>>
>
> I don't think it's written anywhere explicitly, but you can take a look at
> https://blog.racket-lang.org/2020/02/racket-on-chez-status.html in the
> section "Run-Time Performance Redux", which compares the performance of
> generators in Racket 3m vs Racket CS.

Oh, that's useful. Thank you!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/877dxsopth.fsf%40privacyrequired.com.

Reply via email to