At Tue, 19 May 2020 20:10:01 +0000, Sage Gerard wrote: > I'm trying to figure out how to set current-module-name-resolver in > advance of all other code for a process. I'm guessing this would > require a custom launcher that does (for example) `racket -l > foo/replace-resolver bar.rkt`.
That can work if * you either add a `-t` before `bar.rkt` to load it or `foo/replace-resolver` handles command-line arguments; and * you don't need to adjust resolution for any modules that are used in the implementation of `foo/replace-resolver`. > In that sense, I expect that a `replace-resolver` of the form below > wouldn't work because it runs at phase 0, after the expander resolved > everything for `bar.rkt`. If you go the route of adding `-t` before `bar.rkt`, the resolution will not happen until after `foo/replace-resolver` runs. > How do I do what I mean here across all phases, for all uses of > (dynamic-|local-)require everywhere in my program? If you set the module name resolver, it applies to all phases. (That's a hole in Racket's phase separation, and we don't like to talk about it. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20200519144945.17d%40sirmail.smtp.cs.utah.edu.