Hi Guillaume

I don't think I can answer your questions, as I'm not a language developer, 
but this topic interests me;

What are the Racket Syntax Classes you have implemented? Can you provide an 

I'm aware of syntax objects, as a specialised data structure for syntax 
manipulation, but despite the 'object' in the 'syntax-object' I don't
believe they are integrated into the main Racket class/object system.

(This link also has a section on scopes, but I don't know if it is what you 
are looking for?)

Kind regards, 


On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 5:36:08 PM UTC+1, Guillaume Savaton wrote:
> I am a Racket beginner trying to create my own DSL.
> As a long-time user of Xtext and other similar tools in the Eclipse 
> ecosystem, I have come to Racket expecting that it would address similar 
> concerns.
> At the moment, I have mixed feelings: I find the metaprogramming 
> facilities in Racket very effective, but at the same time I am struggling 
> to achieve tasks that were supported natively by Xtext.
> For those who don't know Xtext, here is a summary of how it works:
>    - A language project is based on a grammar with attribute annotations.
>    - The grammar is converted into a "metamodel", i.e. a set of classes 
>    where each grammar rule corresponds to a class.
>    - A parser is automatically generated. It can convert some source text 
>    into a "model", i.e. a set of instances of the classes from the metamodel.
>    - A model can be manipulated using Java APIs. Specialized languages 
>    are available to constrain a model, query it, transform it, or generate 
>    code using templates.
> In Racket, I have started my language project by reproducing what I would 
> have done in Xtext:
>    - I have created a grammar with bragg
>    - I have written a set of syntax classes that play the role of the 
>    metamodel
> Syntax Classes example? 

>    - Syntax objects play the role of the model, and I can get their 
>    attributes with syntax-parse
>    - I have written several macros that can generate Racket code in the 
>    simplest cases.
> However, I miss some facilities that Xtext provides out-of-the-box:
>    - Racket syntax classes do not directly support inheritance.
>    - Syntax objects are not tied to syntax classes in a class-instance 
>    relationship, and I have to use syntax-parse every time I want to read an 
>    attribute.
>    - Xtext automatically creates child->parent references in the 
>    generated AST. In Racket, it seems that I cannot get the parent of a 
> syntax 
>    object.
>    - Xtext provides a default mechanism for resolving named references, 
>    and a scoping API for languages that need specific scoping rules. The AST 
>    generated by Xtext is actually an object graph rather than a tree.
> My main concern is about managing the scopes/lexical contexts in my 
> language. I am still browsing the documentation but I have found no library 
> or guide that addresses this issue.
> The language examples that I have found are either too simple (their 
> scoping rules can be easily mapped to those of Racket through macros), or 
> use ad-hoc techniques, so that it is difficult to infer a general 
> methodology.
> So far, I have made two attempts to work around these issues: (1) by 
> creating a metamodel-like data structure using Racket structs, and 
> transforming syntax objects into struct instances; or (2) using syntax 
> objects only and attaching context data to each of them as a syntax 
> property.
> Both have strengths and weaknesses, and I am still feeling that I am not 
> using Racket with the right mindset.
> I hope I have made my concerns clear. Maybe I can create a small example 
> to further illustrate what I want to do and where I am stuck.
> Have you experienced similar concerns in one of your projects?
> What design patterns would you recommend ?
> Do you know any well-commented real-life example that I could use for 
> inspiration?
> Thanks in advance for your answers.
> Guillaume Savaton
> N.B: I have also published a similar question at stackoverflow two weeks 
> ago, but it still has no answer:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61622912/domain-specific-languages-in-racket-compared-to-model-driven-frameworks-such-as

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

Reply via email to