Hi, I wrote myself this little function:
(define (hash->ordered-list h) (hash-map h cons #t)) which uses the try-order? argument of hash-map. Is there a reason for hash->list not have an optional argument try-order? Or perhaps having such a standalone function would be better? I was planning to submit a patch, but then I thought I may be missing something. - Sergiu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/06052379-819d-45e1-8ea8-5dcced59d557n%40googlegroups.com.
