On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 10:25 PM 'Joel Dueck' via Racket Users <
racket-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:

>
>
>    - Removing dependencies: yes, I see the appeal. I’m really not eager
>    to reimplement all the timezone handling and temporal comparison stuff in
>    gregor, though.
>
> Joel
>

Having done a fair bit of datetime programming, my suggestion on the best
way to handle it is to not handle it.  Let some purpose-built library such
as gregor do it  instead of trying to roll your own, because datetime math
is a nightmare.


> On Monday, October 25, 2021 at 6:36:30 PM UTC-5 Sage Gerard wrote:
>
>> Thank you for this!!
>>
>> Feedback
>>
>>    - I like your podcast-specific entries
>>    - The validation logic is refreshing to see
>>    - Re: boolean arguments, I'd stick to keyword arguments and ask for
>>    any/c, not boolean?, in contracts. That way forms like (and ... (member
>>    ...)) won't bug users about a non-threatening contract violation, and it's
>>    trivial to cast the value yourself.
>>    - Unsure what licenses are compatible with Blue Oak. If you want more
>>    licensing options re: IANA media type to extension mappings, here are 
>> some.
>>    - MIT: https://github.com/mime-types/mime-types-data
>>       - Apache 2.0 (From the horse's mouth):
>>       https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/conf/mime.types
>>       - CC-BY-SA: Scrape MDN's table using the console on
>>       
>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Basics_of_HTTP/MIME_types/Common_types
>>    - I normally don't use functions like splitflap-version because I
>>    can't assume that a package will define one. I'd use a program that 
>> returns
>>    a version of a given package.
>>    - Why is language-codes a procedure?
>>    - You have a lot of local contract boundaries, so values may get
>>    checked more than necessary.
>>    - Prefer example.com so you don't have to leak your URLs or make up
>>    email addresses that actually go to an inbox.
>>    - txexpr, gregor, and web-server dependencies don't look terribly
>>    difficult to remove
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Racket Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/cb2927c7-3d21-41c3-89c7-d6b73a9e53f9n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/cb2927c7-3d21-41c3-89c7-d6b73a9e53f9n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAE8gKoc93-d6gUXYEhA_L-bM%3DzqWBbu9UG2TtvX-nqTHaKA_jA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to