> Am 2016-03-14 16:51, schrieb Guglielmetti, Robert: >> Ah! I did not know that. I had ASSumed that yours was the only Windows >> version, and so when we started the GitHub mirror we just rolled our own >> rvu, thinking there were no open source options at the time. I have no >> idea where the source for that Desktop Radiance rvu might be. > > The sources to both winrview and winimage are sitting here on my > disk. I don't think the DR team changed anything relevant after > my fixes. > > Unfortunately, my old contract with LBNL does not cover > redistribution in source form. To make this possible, we'd need > some statement from them that those programs can be considered a > part of the normal Radiance distribution and fall under the > "Radiance open source license". > > @Greg, are you entitled to make such a statement?
I think so. I'm generally the gatekeeper to the Radiance source tree, and can "welcome" new code that is offered. Since LBNL contracted you to develop it in the first place from what you say, this should not present a problem. -Greg _______________________________________________ Radiance-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-dev
