HI Steven Steven Southard wrote:
You mean because the name is page attachments? I think it'd be convenient to locate attachments in snippets too. Snippets need images just as much at pages. If a snippet had images maybe pages wouldn't need quite as many. I guess, next your going to tell me layouts don't need attachments either. Sure would be convenient.
I'm sorry if my answer came across as rude/ mean (cut me some slack - it was sent at 2:45AM) - I didn't mean just the name. I meant to imply that it attaches to pages and is designed for that, while snippets often are included in multiple pages and may have different contexts. (I have some times used a single known page as the base referred from snippets).
But definitely the explanation that followed my email was better! Cheers, Mohit. 4/17/2009 | 1:03 PM. _______________________________________________ Radiant mailing list Post: [email protected] Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
