On Aug 18, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Haselwanter Edmund wrote:

For me the most important point is on how is the future and "glue" to radiant core. That's why I asked on the state of core discussions.

In that case I would prefer Vhost. Its approach is closer to what we've talked about for core inclusion, which may make it easier to upgrade to a hypothetical future core release that provides its own multi-domain functionality.

If you went with MultiSite you'd probably end up either tweaking your other extensions or installing MultiSite-specific forks, like the Paperclipped fork. Once you do that, you limit your upgrade options.

MultiSite is also meant to run several domains that share as much as possible -- including the admin interface (one client, multiple domains.) So if your sites are independently operated, Vhost is more appropriate anyway.

Reply via email to