Hi Aaron -
On Fri, 29 Oct 1999, Aaron Holtz wrote:
> Hugh,
>
> I've discovered the problem - only Clients designated by a
> <Client></Client> clause work - anything labled as an IdenticalClients
> does not work. Example:
>
> <Client 111.111.111.20>
> Secret pw
> </Client>
>
>
> That would match Client-Id for 111.111.111.20 whether it is with a regex
> or direct. However,
>
> <Client 111.111.111.3>
> IdenticalClients 111.111.111.20
> Secret pw
> </Client>
>
>
> That would NOT match 111.111.111.20 because it isn't on the Client line.
> Can a patch be made to include the IdenticalClients listed to work with
> the Client-Id check item? It seems practical that IdenticalClients
> should/could be subject to checks just like the listed Client IP's would
> be. Thoughts?
>
Ahhhh - but of course my dear Watson!!
Clearly IdenticalClients should behave in the way you expect - we'll fix it up
next week when Mike returns to Melbourne.
Thanks for your help!
Hugh
--
Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
anywhere. SQL, proxy, DBM, files, LDAP, NIS+, password, NT, Emerald,
Platypus, Freeside, TACACS+, PAM, external, etc etc on Unix, Win95/8,
NT, Rhapsody
===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
