Hello Hugh and everybody!
As you request me, i send the logfile with tracelevel 4, it give us more
ideas about what is happening...
Do you have any suggestion about it?
Thank You a lot!
************************************************
Tue Jun 13 12:36:05 2000: DEBUG: Packet dump:
*** Received from 200.30.48.214 port 1646 ....
Code: Accounting-Request
Identifier: 13
Authentic: ><220><216><228><137>r<254><147><135>zr[r<149><240><139>
Attributes:
NAS-IP-Address = 209.198.194.65
NAS-Port = 34
NAS-Port-Type = Async
User-Name = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Acct-Status-Type = Alive
Acct-Authentic = RADIUS
Service-Type = Framed-User
Acct-Session-Id = "0000AE88"
Framed-Protocol = PPP
Framed-IP-Address = 209.198.194.78
Acct-Delay-Time = 30
Tue Jun 13 12:36:05 2000: DEBUG: Handling request with Handler
'Realm=DEFAULT'
Tue Jun 13 12:36:05 2000: DEBUG: SDB1 Adding session for
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 209.198.194.65, 34
Tue Jun 13 12:36:05 2000: DEBUG: Handling with Radius::AuthRADIUS
Tue Jun 13 12:36:05 2000: DEBUG: Packet dump:
*** Sending to 200.30.36.7 port 11813 ....
Code: Accounting-Request
Identifier: 25
Authentic: <0><0><0><0><0><0><0><0><0><0><0><0><0><0><0><0>
Attributes:
NAS-IP-Address = 209.198.194.65
NAS-Port = 34
NAS-Port-Type = Async
User-Name = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Acct-Status-Type = Alive
Acct-Authentic = RADIUS
Service-Type = Framed-User
Acct-Session-Id = "0000AE88"
Framed-Protocol = PPP
Framed-IP-Address = 209.198.194.78
Acct-Delay-Time = 0
NASGroupAnalog = True
Timestamp = 960921335
Tue Jun 13 12:36:05 2000: DEBUG: Packet dump:
*** Received from 200.30.36.7 port 11813 ....
Code: Accounting-Response
Identifier: 10
Authentic: <145>a<154><188><203><194><15>*&<200>X<186><240><254><157><23>
Attributes:
Tue Jun 13 12:36:05 2000: WARNING: Unknown reply received in AuthRADIUS
for request 10 from 200.30.36.7:11813
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Hugh Irvine wrote:
>
> Hello Iris -
>
> > IT SEEMS THAT MY RADIATOR DOESN'T UNDERSTAND WHAT NETSERVER RETURNS IN HIS
> > ACCOUNTING PORT: 11813
> >
> > DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEAS/SUGGESTION TO CORRECT THIS??
> >
>
> It would be helpful to have a full trace 4 debug to see the contents of the
> packets, but as the port number is reported as 11813, I am assuming that these
> are accounting packets? I would first of all check the shared secrets to verify
> that they are correct, and if the problem is only with accounting packets you
> could try the IgnoreAcctSignature parameter for the Client.
>
> hth
>
> Hugh
>
===
Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
