Hello Jaskaran -

I suspect your Radiator configuration is listening on different ports to where you are sending the requests from radpwtst (which defaults to 1645/1646).

To specify different ports, use the following parameters:

perl radpwtst -auth_port .... -acct_port .... -trace .... -user .... -password ....

Here is the "help" from radpwtst:

bash-2.05a$ perl radpwtst -h
usage: radpwtst [-h] [-time] [-iterations n]
[-trace [level]] [-s server] [-secret secret]
[-noauth] [-noacct][-nostart] [-nostop] [-status]
[-chap] [-mschap] [-mschapv2] [-eapmd5]
[-accton] [-acctoff] [-framed_ip_address address]
[-auth_port port] [-acct_port port] [-identifier n]
[-user username] [-password password] [-nas_ip_address address]
[-nas_port port] [-nas_port_type type] [-service_type service]
[-calling_station_id string] [-called_station_id string]
[-session_id string] [-interactive]
[-delay_time n] [-session_time n] [-input_octets n]
[-output_octets n] [-timeout n] [-dictionary file,file]
[-gui] [-class string] [-useoldascendpasswords]
[-code requestcode] [-raw data] [-rawfile filename]
[attribute=value]...



On Friday, Jun 27, 2003, at 02:54 Australia/Melbourne, jsingh wrote:

Hi Hugh

�I just installed the radiator server over to my production box which is a Solaris Server, when I send a access request from radpwtst I get a response saying no response.

I looked at the logs and there is nothing there just the banner message stating radiator was started and the ports its listening on for authentication and accounting.

Where did I go wrong.

Thanks





Jaskaran Singh

University Systems & Security

FairleighDickinsonUniversity

Teaneck,NJ07666





NB: have you included a copy of your configuration file (no secrets),
together with a trace 4 debug showing what is happening?

--
Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
anywhere. Available on *NIX, *BSD, Windows 95/98/2000, NT, MacOS X.
-
Nets: internetwork inventory and management - graphical, extensible,
flexible with hardware, software, platform and database independence.

Reply via email to